Last updated 30 April 2026
What LexCases is, what it isn’t, and what you must verify yourself.
Research tool, not legal advice
LexCases is an AI-assisted research tool. This page sets out the limitations you should assume when reading any AI-generated summary, case-law analysis, or quote produced by the platform, and the verification work that remains your responsibility.
You should read this page once before relying on a LexCases result for coursework, exam preparation, or client work, and again when a new feature is announced.
LexCases is an AI-assisted research aid for law students, junior lawyers, and researchers. It turns a natural-language brief into candidate authorities proposed by an AI model, checks each one before showing it, and sets out summaries that help you decide which cases are worth reading in full. It does not search a case-law database.
LexCases is built to point you at the right cases faster - not to replace reading the cases, your tutor's guidance, or your supervising solicitor's judgment.
LexCases is not a solicitor, barrister, or qualified legal adviser. Nothing produced by the platform is legal advice on which you, your colleagues, your tutors, or your clients can rely.
LexCases does not establish a solicitor-client relationship, a barrister-client relationship, or any other professional adviser relationship between you and Radwan Hajjar trading as LexCases AI or anyone working on the platform.
LexCases does not draft pleadings, opinions, contracts, or any other document for use in legal proceedings on your behalf.
AI summaries are descriptive, not authoritative. They can omit nuance, misstate ratios, conflate concurring and dissenting opinions, miss procedural posture, or describe the law as it stood at a date earlier than today.
AI may invent or mis-cite cases ("hallucinate"). Every case LexCases shows has been through a separate check and anything unconfirmed is dropped, but that check is itself an AI process and is not a substitute for the primary record. You must still open the source and confirm the citation, the holding, and that the case has not been distinguished, doubted, or overruled.
Quotations rendered as “relevant quotes” on a case card are AI-selected excerpts. Verify the wording against the official report before quoting them.
AI reasoning per authority is a structured synthesis drawn from the cases above. Treat it as a starting point for your own analysis, not a finished answer.
Before relying on any case, holding, or proposition produced by LexCases - in coursework, in exam preparation, in pupillage research, or in client work - you must read the underlying judgment in full from an authoritative source and form your own view of what it stands for.
Where a case is cited as still good law, you must confirm its current standing using a citator (e.g. JustCite, KeyCite, or a Westlaw signal) before relying on it in court or in client correspondence.
If you are a student, this verification is also good academic practice - most marking schemes penalise reliance on AI summaries that turn out to be wrong.
If you are a junior lawyer, your firm or chambers will have a supervising solicitor or pupil-master responsible for reviewing your research. LexCases is not a substitute for that supervision.
By using LexCases you acknowledge that you do not rely on any output of the platform as professional legal advice, and that Radwan Hajjar trading as LexCases AI has not assumed responsibility for the legal correctness of any summary, case-law analysis, or quote produced by the platform.
Where the law of your jurisdiction permits Radwan Hajjar trading as LexCases AI to disclaim liability for negligent misstatement and for losses arising from reliance on AI-generated content, that disclaimer is given. Where it does not (for example, because you are a consumer with non-waivable statutory rights), the disclaimer applies to the maximum extent permitted by law.
If you spot an error in a LexCases summary, a hallucinated citation, or an AI output that you believe is misleading, please report it to support@lexcases.ai with the search ID. Reports help us improve retrieval quality and ranking.
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Effective 30 April 2026. Read the Terms of service →